December 10, 2012

New Species of 'Decoy' Spider Likely Discovered At Tambopata Research Center

31 comments
Image by Phil Torres
From afar, it appears to be a medium sized spider about an inch across, possibly dead and dried out, hanging in the center of a spider web along the side of the trail. Nothing too out of the ordinary for the Amazon. As you approach, the spider starts to wobble quickly forward and back, letting you know this spider is, in fact, alive. 
Step in even closer and things start to get weird- that spider form you were looking at is actually made up of tiny bits of leaf, debris, and dead insects. The confusion sets in. How can something be constructed to look like a spider, how is it moving, and what kind of creature made this!?
It turns out the master designer behind this somewhat creepy form is in fact a tiny spider, only about 5mm in body length, that is hiding behind or above that false, bigger spider made up of debris. After discussing with several spider experts, we've determined it is quite probable that this spider is a never-before-seen species in the genus Cyclosa. This genus is known for having spiders that put debris in their webs to either attract prey or, as in this case, confuse anything trying to eat them.
Decoy Spider found in Peru
"Charlotte's got nothing on me"
You could call it a spider decoy, in a sense. The spiders arrange debris along specialized silk strands called stabilimenta in a symmetrical form that makes it look almost exactly like a larger spider hanging in the web. Studies have found that some Cyclosa species have a higher survival rate against potential predators like paper wasps because the wasps end up attacking the debris in the web rather than the spider itself. As seen here, Cyclosa can make debris look a bit like a spider, but not nearly as detailed as the spiders found at the Tambopata Research Center which have a complex form that actually looks like a bigger version of themselves, complete with legs and all.
After asking other experts, I cannot seem find another example of an animal creating a bigger, decoy version of itself to escape predation, making this species not only interesting to taxonomists naming new species but to those who study animal behavior, as well. 
After 3 days of searching we found about 25 of the spiders found in one floodplain area surrounding the Tambopata Research Center. Extensive searches in other areas did not turn up any of the spiders, showing that they have a rather restricted range, at least locally.
The actual spider (left) and constructed decoys (right)
Images by: Phil Torres and Jeff Cremer 
What’s the next step after discovering a new species? It takes a lot of time and effort to go from finding it in the field to actually describing it. Specimens will have to be collected to compare to known species, dissections done on identifying features like the genitalia, and descriptions will have to be written to show why this species is different from others,  a type specimen will have to be selected, and the eventual publication of all of that information in a journal. Only then can it be considered a named new species to science.
For now, we are looking for spider-specialists to collaborate with to describe this species, and enjoying pointing it out to tourists who come to Tambopata to check out all of our strange, interesting wildlife.
Phil Torres is available to live-stream video from one of the spiders in January and March. Please contact philtorrestv@gmail.com for those interested.

Follow Phil Torres on twitter.


The 'decoys' were built with a variety of forms and numbers of legs. Image by Jeff Cremer.

A close-up of one of the spiders. Image by Steve Gettle.

















31 comments:

  1. "Art as a means of survival", truly amazing research!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I must take exception with the premise of these decoy spiders as art. That's preposterous...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Maybe I missed the sarcasm, but actually, offhand I can't think of a better example of art in an animal other than humans! (Simply because it is functional or possibly "instinctual" does not invalidate its status as art.) Giacometti indeed! Just... life-saving, that's all.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Pretty damn clever spiders right there.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Does this imply self-awareness in this spider? In order to create a replica/decoy it has to have some type of knowledge of itself as a spider, even if it is copying something else it sees, like a larger spider's web, it would have to make the connection between a spider in the abstract and the spider "I am."

    ReplyDelete
  6. Gary Bastoky -- you are misunderstanding the slow process of natural selection that produced this behaviour.

    I'm sure earlier spiders of this species began, quite accidentally, leaving rudimentary "decoys" (though not intended as such) and were at least moderately more successful at passing on their genes than non-decoy producing spiders. Over large spans of time, genes that encoded even more specific "decoy"-building behaviours were selected for, as the decoys would be more effective the more they ressembled their author.

    There is no reason to infer self-awareness on behalf of the spider.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Can anybody refer me somewhere that I can post a picture of a possible spider bite? I would like to know if anybody can tell me species of spider by looking at bite

    ReplyDelete
  8. Though I understand the slow natural selection involved in this behavior, I think there is some illustration of self-awareness on the spider's part. For the spider to create legs in addition to provoking the decoy with its own movement elevates this discussion beyond biological instinct, I think.

    I am referring to Julian Jayne's 'The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind.' His work details the long, arduous process ancient humans underwent to achieve similar stages of image representation. Consciousness, as I understood it, is more a stage in a spectrum of understanding rather than a 'you have it or you don't' mentality. I believe this finding is evidence of an evolution very similar to that of the human.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hi Bristol, very interesting points and thanks for commenting. What probably makes this a case of not being self-aware is that this spider appears to be making a decoy, mimic version of another larger spider species in the area rather than itself. The visual system of these spiders are very likely not good enough for them to take a step back and look at the constructed decoy (which would indicate conscious image representation), rather they are following complicated behavioural rules and patterns to place the debris, just as they follow complicated rules and patterns to make a web in the first place.

    This to me serves as a great example of how detailed behavioral systems can evolve in the face of strong natural selection from predators.

    ReplyDelete
  10. The neural cluster that is this spiders brain is probably extremely small, and thus roughly equivalent to an embedded circuit in terms of processing power. Enough to display quasi-intelligent traits, but not enough to have complex image processing.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Not being a scientist, I still have to wonder how much we really know and how much we just think we know about the natural world. I remember reading, some time ago, that linking brain size to intelligence is now akin to believing in phrenology. Can you really make the analogy of an embedded circuit's processing power to a spider's brain? Which embedded circuit? Image processing? Is a living being really just a computer?

    Again, I'm "only" an artist/designer, so I tend to trust my intuition, and although I'm not saying that this spider has the capabilities to propose a unified field theory, I have to question how much we really don't know and how many of our assumptions are regularly influenced by human prejudice. How open are we to questioning our assumptions? Because a dog doesn't speak, does it mean it can't communicate complex emotions? We are finding that elephants communicate via low frequency sound -- because we can't hear it, we assumed it didn't exist.

    All I'm saying is to respect the spider as you would want to be respected and by giving respect to others, you learn more than you ever imagined.

    ReplyDelete
  12. We know the proccessing capabilities based on neural tissue size. The physics of this universe and the makeup of life on this planet interact in a way that does not allow for the processing power an animal would need for sentience. An embedded circuit nowadays can be rather complex. But the brain power of the spider is something akin to a hopped up remote control.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Kori, that makes sense to me. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  14. The web decoration is called a "stabilimentum", http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_decoration, many theories exist as to the function, the vibration behavior is also mentioned in the above reference. Some researchers think the stabilimentum performs as a warning to birds that may fly through the web otherwise.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Arachnos Tambopata Cyclosa... That could be it's "Latin name" for now probably. It's a spider, it was found in the Tambopata Nature Preserve, and it seems to be related to the Cyclosa genus. Makes sense to me.

    ReplyDelete
  16. De kooi Cyclosa sounds good! Or illusory (Illusorius Cyclosa). Nice find!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Stuart Wilson.... are you seriously using Wikipedia as a reference?

    ReplyDelete
  18. "Does this imply self-awareness in this spider?"

    Not at all.

    "In order to create a replica/decoy it has to have some type of knowledge of itself as a spider"

    No, it only has to "know how" to construct that web, it does not have to "know that" it is a spider, or anything else.

    "even if it is copying something else it sees"

    It isn't copying anything. Spiders don't learn.

    "it would have to make the connection between a spider in the abstract and the spider 'I am.'"

    Do you have any idea how many (few) neurons there are in a spider's "brain"? Not enough to makes connections or have abstractions or anything of the sort.

    "Stuart Wilson.... are you seriously using Wikipedia as a reference?"

    One encounters many boneheaded, wrong-headed ideas that get repeated on the web, but there are few as boneheaded and wrong-headed as the notion that one should not use Wikipedia as a reference.

    ReplyDelete
  19. "Not being a scientist, I still have to wonder how much we really know and how much we just think we know about the natural world. "

    Gary, you're presuming to know a lot more about the state of scientific knowledge than is warranted.

    "I remember reading, some time ago, that linking brain size to intelligence is now akin to believing in phrenology."

    Strawman and logical error. A brain can be arbitrarily large and complex and yet have very low unintelligence (e.g., it could be dead or in a coma), but a brain cannot be arbitrarily small and simple and yet have very high intelligence.

    "Can you really make the analogy of an embedded circuit's processing power to a spider's brain?"

    Yes.

    "Which embedded circuit?"

    A cognitive circuit.

    "Is a living being really just a computer?"

    Yes, in the sense that its behavior function is equivalent to some finite state machine.

    "Again, I'm "only" an artist/designer, so I tend to trust my intuition"

    Intuitions are powerful heuristics, but it's important to understand their limitations. Science has demonstrated that intuition is unreliable, regardless of what you are.

    "I have to question how much we really don't know and how many of our assumptions are regularly influenced by human prejudice."

    What you should be questioning are your own prejudices (or intuitions, if you prefer to call them that).

    "How open are we to questioning our assumptions?"

    How open are you to questioning your assumptions about other people's assumptions?

    "Because a dog doesn't speak, does it mean it can't communicate complex emotions?"

    No, of course not,not, who ever claimed that? Do your intuitions lead you to attack such strawmen?

    "We are finding that elephants communicate via low frequency sound -- because we can't hear it, we assumed it didn't exist."

    Who assumed that? I never did. I've never seen or heard anyone named George Leroy MacGillicuddy, but I don't therefore assume that there is no such person. Not knowing that something is true is nothing like assuming that it is false. But it may be reasonable to expect something to be false when there is *evidence and logic* that leads in that direction; that's not an assumption, it's an *inference* ... which is what science is all about: inference to the best explanation of all evidence obtained to date. New evidence can produce new inferences.

    ReplyDelete
  20. "Though I understand the slow natural selection involved in this behavior"

    Your comment indicates otherwise.

    "I think there is some illustration of self-awareness on the spider's part."

    There isn't.

    "For the spider to create legs in addition to provoking the decoy with its own movement elevates this discussion beyond biological instinct, I think. "

    That is completely and utterly wrong. The spider does not "create legs", it places debris in locations on the web that have a rough geometric resemblance to the positions of spider legs. A program to do that is fairly simple and requires no knowledge whatsoever of "legs" ... or of anything else. It is only "know how", not "know that". The spider possesses such a program because spiders with such a program is more likely to avoid be killed by predators and thus more likely to pass the genes that produce such a program. Visual image formation has nothing to do with it. (And you should be aware that Jaynes's book is largely speculative, and probably largely wrong.)

    ReplyDelete
  21. "What probably makes this a case of not being self-aware is that this spider appears to be making a decoy, mimic version of another larger spider species in the area rather than itself. "

    No, it just produces something that sometimes vaguely resembles a large spider, making it more likely that predators will go for some of the debris rather than the actual spider. It's not aware of other spiders any more than it is aware of itself (which is not at all).

    ReplyDelete
  22. I will be forwarding this to my son so that he could learn this..
    responsive themes

    ReplyDelete
  23. Congratulations for this wonderful reading article. I found it very informative and interesting too, I think you are a brilliant writer. I have bookmarked your blog and will return in the future. I want to encourage you to continue that marvelous work, have a great daytime!
    Graphic design australia


    Please update it more often as I find it very professional and informative for your visitors.
    website cms system

    ReplyDelete
  24. Wow, just looking at these pictures send shivers down my spine. However it looks like, I really can't stand spiders!

    -Bethany Morrison

    ReplyDelete
  25. Hey, How are going on?

    If u has a while please check out, I will see all-time your website on blog.perunature.com.It is a wonderful website for of all us.This website help us many way.I will save this weblog because it has some essential info.So I want to know these issues as I am going to demonstrate you how to make a web page in WordPress in less than 10 min. I will show How to create a website. Wordpress platforms is a free foundation (free) web page designer which you can handle online. You will learn how Easy it is to set up WordPress, along with simple guidelines on "How to make some primary options in WordPress." But first, you will need to make web host with HostGator. In it clip I have defined this detailed.

    Thank you for your Excellent Article.

    ReplyDelete
  26. That is so amazing! at the beginning I thought it was a huge Peruvian spider, that tiny spider is definitely a master in camouflage.

    ReplyDelete

 
© 2013 Peru Nature Blog
powered by Blogger